This column is an opinion by Harmeet Nanner, a analysis analyst on the Centre for Habit and Psychological Well being in Toronto. For extra details about CBC’s Opinion part, please see the FAQ.

Within the Seventies, Taiwan started an effort to radically rework its health-care system. Build up its provide of health-care assets to serve a quickly industrializing nation was the primary precedence, however the extra advanced downside was how health-care providers ought to be funded whereas offering equitable entry for all. 

Within the late 80s, an skilled activity power was commissioned to deal with this difficulty, and William Hsiao, a Harvard economics professor famend for his work on health-care financing, was chosen as chief advisor. 

Prof. Hsiao started an financial research of insurance coverage schemes in six international locations: the U.S., the U.Ok., Germany, France, Canada and Japan. The outcomes have been in favour of a single-payer system primarily based on Canada’s expertise with medicare within the 80s, at which period the standard of providers was very excessive. This helped affect Taiwan to additionally undertake a single-payer framework, a program they name the Nationwide Well being Insurance coverage (NHI).

The duty power discovered from each the successes and failures of Canada and over a dozen different international locations to piece collectively a system that was ideally suited for Taiwan. Consequently, our programs can look fairly completely different, although they share the identical fundamental framework. 

Taiwan excellent at controlling prices

The analysis and data-driven course of has allowed for a finely-tuned system, such that the NHI can present complete protection for dental, prescribed drugs, bodily rehabilitation, and extra, all whereas placing a decent lid on prices — and it’s excellent at controlling prices. 

In 2017, Taiwan’s nationwide well being expenditure (NHE) was 6.1 per cent of GDP; the OECD common that yr was 8.8 per cent, and Canada’s NHE was 10.4 per cent. Most spectacular is how a lot efficiency is squeezed out of each greenback; whereas Canadians have spent the final 20 years more and more haunted by wait occasions, the Taiwanese system is notable for having minimal wait occasions. 

Am I suggesting that Taiwan has the right system? Positively not. There are some obtrusive points and a few features could also be unacceptable to Canadians, however the system’s effectivity implies that Taiwan has plenty of room to extend its health-care funds to deal with shortcomings. 

Then again, Canada’s health-care system is just tragic. We’re seeing it at its worst proper now, however our system has been failing Canadians for a lot of years, most clearly with wait occasions. 

As Prof. Hsiao notes, Canadian well being care started its descent within the Nineties, when funding grew tight throughout a recession. Nevertheless, the Canadian system has at all times been lacking sure options that might maximize how effectively we use the assets we’re paying for. 

Even now, Canada’s NHE is among the many highest within the OECD. 

What precisely will we get for such excessive prices? In accordance with the Commonwealth Fund, which made a very complete comparability of well being care in 11 completely different international locations (Taiwan shouldn’t be considered one of them), Canada has absolutely the worst system of common care. 

Some could assume that the message of this text is for Canada to emulate the particular insurance policies and procedures that Taiwan has constructed their system out of, however that is really not it. What I need us to emulate is the course of that Taiwanese officers used to realize their well being care success, a means of mobilizing the world’s information and counting on a various group of specialists to create efficient coverage options. 

The duty power which led to the creation of the NHI was notable for the way it reached throughout borders with a view to get the very best data obtainable. The Canadian federal authorities ought to equally convey collectively an skilled activity power to make suggestions on complete well being care reform, not simply on the problem of funding and medical health insurance, however for all elements that make up the system, comparable to insurance policies that may allow more practical well being care supply. 

Politics is the toughest half

The troublesome a part of this plan is the politicians and federalism. Our governments could be fairly good about calling skilled teams collectively to make suggestions, however they’re horrible at implementing them, a minimum of because it pertains to well being care. A number of government-sanctioned stories have been produced prior to now to advise on strategies of bettering, modernizing, and sustaining the health-care system, however these stories have largely been ignored. 

In 2002, following the publication of the Romanow Fee report, one ballot discovered {that a} majority of Canadians accepted of it, however 39 per cent have been pessimistic that its recommendation can be adopted. Sadly, these Canadians have been proper, however had they been flawed, we most likely would not have so many shuttered ERs in the meanwhile. 

Those that bear in mind previous advisory stories could scoff at my suggestion as one other ineffective try and reform well being care, a waste of cash to make suggestions that may go nowhere. I disagree. 

The discussions I usually hear about reforming the system, within the public, media, and from governments, are far faraway from the options which might be probably the most transformative and well-researched. Within the worst case, an skilled activity power would assist thrust alternate options into the general public dialogue, and this might assist the voters of right this moment to grasp simply what kinds of insurance policies their governments ought to be supporting. 

The perfect case is, after all, that these insurance policies undergo. With the tragic state of health-care providers, droves of health-care staff pushed to the brink, the clear failure relative to different OECD international locations, and a single-payer position mannequin in Taiwan, we could lastly have the motivation we have to repair our beloved health-care system.

Do you might have a powerful opinion that might add perception, illuminate a difficulty within the information, or change how folks take into consideration a difficulty? We wish to hear from you. Here is find out how to pitch to us.