Ganshorn, Moussa: Beware ‘privatization creep’ in training system

Article content material

Public funding of personal faculties has been on the radar in Saskatchewan not too long ago in gentle of troubling allegations of abuse at Legacy Christian Academy, a college that receives vital public funds (greater than $730,000 final yr). Whereas faculties like Legacy at present obtain 50 per cent of the per-student allocation of scholars within the public system, Saskatchewan has introduced plans to create a brand new class of personal faculties that will be funded at 75 per cent of the general public per-student allocation. In a current interview with CBC, Schooling Minister Dustin Duncan mentioned that Legacy would have met the factors for this degree of funding, although it won’t be funded at this degree pending an investigation.

Article content material

This funding hike, which appears to have been applied with out public session, will put Saskatchewan effectively forward of the remainder of the nation, the place public funding for personal faculties ranges from zero in Ontario to 70 per cent in Alberta. Our group, Help Our College students Alberta, advocates for an equitable and accessible public training system. We now have seen years of “privatization creep” in Alberta training, and we’re dismayed to see Saskatchewan pursuing an analogous path.

Article content material

Privatization isn’t about people paying for selections outdoors the general public system, it’s about diverting public {dollars} to non-public, unaccountable entities. As that is usually unpopular, privatizers work exhausting to fabricate consent utilizing different arguments.

Article content material

Non-public faculties desire to name themselves “unbiased faculties” (regardless of growing dependence on public funds). Proponents recommend that public funding for assembly sure necessities balances a college’s independence with an affordable degree of oversight by authorities.

Nonetheless, the Legacy case means that these guidelines are enforced minimally till a disaster attracts scrutiny. It’s an unimaginable contradiction to have a college that’s each “unbiased” and topic to authorities oversight. We should always all query the usage of public funds for unaccountable organizations which will place susceptible youngsters in a precarious state of affairs.

Privatizers body training as a non-public good reasonably than a public one which advantages all of society. On this view, “mum or dad alternative” is the overriding worth, reasonably than the precise of all youngsters to a high quality training, or the broader societal curiosity in having an training system that prepares future residents to take part in democracy.

Article content material

Privatizers argue it’s solely honest for folks to take “their” share of public funding to the supplier of their alternative. However this isn’t how publicly funded providers work. If we don’t use the general public library, we don’t get a subsidy to go purchase books at Indigo as an alternative. Nor do individuals with out youngsters obtain any type of tax break as a result of they aren’t straight utilizing the training system. Taxes are collected from everybody, to fund public providers that serve everybody.

Privatizers recommend that personal college households are someway costing the general public system much less as a result of their youngsters obtain much less funding. Nonetheless, funding people isn’t how training spending works. The per-student allocation is supposed to be an estimate of how a lot an “common” baby prices to teach. Some youngsters require extra assets than others, and that per-student funding is pooled to serve all college students.

Article content material

Non-public faculties can choose college students with fewer particular wants, from better-off households. When “funding follows the scholar” out of the general public and into the personal system, public faculties threat being left with fewer college students, however a larger focus of high-needs college students, and fewer {dollars} to assist these wants. Colleges even have mounted prices equivalent to utilities and upkeep, which they need to now cowl with much less funding, or make exhausting selections equivalent to closing faculties, growing class sizes, or chopping assist workers.

A well-funded public training system is the precise of each baby, and the accountability of us all. Privatization creep threatens public training and is finished largely with out public dialogue.

Article content material

Heather Ganshorn is the analysis director and Medeana Moussa is the chief director for Help Our College students Alberta.

Notice: This piece ran alongside an alternate view within the Chief-Put up and StarPhoenix on Thursday. Click on right here to see the opposite op-ed.

Need to understand how we determine what to cowl and the way editorial choices are made on the Regina Chief-Put up and Saskatoon StarPhoenix? Get the weekly Letter From the Editor e-newsletter from the Editor in Chief Russell Wangersky and be a part of the dialogue on what goes into masking information and delivering commentary, each in print and on-line. Click on right here to subscribe.